Hi,
While I'm at it, a co-worker gave this one to me earlier today.
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Dec 20 01:45:25 EST 1999
FreeBSD(root)/tmp %cc -v
Using builtin specs.
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
FreeBSD(root)/tmp %cc -O foo.c -o foo.o -c
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
static void getsig11(parfree,dbl,lambda)
long parfree;
double *dbl;
double *lambda;
{
long i, j;
j = -1;
for(i = 0; i < parfree; i++) {
j += i+1;
dbl[j] *= (1.0 + *lambda);
}
return;
}
Yes, the algorithm looks funny, but is correct. The program will
compile correctly if the 'j += i+1;' is changed to 'j = i+1;' or if
the variable 'lambda' is changed from a pointer to an actual value.
Anyone want to take a stab at this? I'm not a big compiler
person myself... (Dave, you there?).
Thanks,
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message