In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: A "devd" program would solve 98% of what devfs could solve.  It cannot
: solve the homebrew-a-vnode-for-the-root-fs problem.  FreeBSD needs a
: "devd" program *anyway* because what good is dynamic devices if you
: can't do something intelligent with them when they appear (mount/ifconfig
: etc etc etc).

Yes.  I'd like to see this in the future.  There is no reason to have
pccardd after the cut over to the new code.  I don't think there is a
reason to have both devd and usbd.  They all just do things when
devices come and go.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to