Motoyuki Konno wrote: > > I think we don't need "a.out world" any more, but a.out support > (a.out lib/shared lib, etc.) is still needed. Some commercial > programs such as Netscape are in a.out only, so we still have to > make a.out binaries. > > Please see Netscape plugin port (ports/www/flashplugin) to find > out why we still have to need a.out support. Current is not a general use platform. And if we want them (third party) to support FreeBSD-elf by the time 4.x becomes -stable, we better lock them out of it *now*. The main reason for removing the legacy support is forcing people to switch. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) who is as social as a wampas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from cu... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed fro... David O'Brien
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed... Garrett Wollman
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from cu... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed fro... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was rem... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' wa... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from cu... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed fro... Annelise Anderson
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from cu... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed fro... Chuck Robey
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was rem... Chuck Robey
- Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from current... Marcel Moolenaar