In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have : stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial. OK. I'll likely state what I'd like to see as a patch. : I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the : sysctl ps(1) uses ? Yes. I'll firm this up later today and send an exact proposal out so we can kill this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Forrest Aldrich
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Christopher Masto
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Peter Wemm
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Matthew Dillon
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Peter Wemm
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Wes Peters
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Warner Losh
- Re: ps on 4.0-current David Malone
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Dan Nelson
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Mike Smith
- Re: ps on 4.0-current Garrett Wollman