On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
> > > That's the perfect example of how and where not to use
> > > -CURRENT.
> >
> > And your argument could be not to use -STABLE or -RELEASE since
> > both would have the same problems. Like I said before, it's not which
>
> Quite the reverse. You _should_ anticipate an unbootable
> system at each upgrade of -CURRENT. We're not trying to make
> another -STABLE here.
That is a known factor but I'm just saying booting with a newer
kernel than the bins adds up another issue altogether.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________ __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ]
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
