> you don't under stand, we are NOT talking about upgrades, we are talking
> about how to make a buildable system on -stable...
There are essentially the same problem. In order to do an upgrade, you
have to be able to build on -stable. :)
> ===> libgcc
> echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>' > config.h
> echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>' >> config.h
> echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"' > tconfig.h
> echo '#include "i386/i386.h"' > tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/att.h"' >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"' >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/perform.h"' >> tm.h
> cc -c -nostdinc -O -pipe -pipe -O -pipe -O
>-I/a/home/johng/FreeBSD-checkout/40current/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/config
>
>-I/a/home/johng/FreeBSD-checkout/40current/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/egcs/gcc
> -I. -fexceptions -DIN_GCC
>-I/usr/obj/a/home/johng/FreeBSD-checkout/40current/src/tmp/usr/include -DL_mulsi3 -o
>_mulsi3.o
>/a/home/johng/FreeBSD-checkout/40current/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/libgcc1.c
> cc1: Invalid option `-fexceptions'
This is unrelated to the signal code. Why are you jumping on Marcel for
this?
In any case, I believe there is work in progress as well as interest in
making *something* work. Let's all quit yelling at one another and
start working towards a solution, instead of pointing fingers and
screaming 'he broke it and won't fix it'. :)
Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
