John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > but I'm developing for -current... I do a buildworld on my 3.0-R box > and move it over to the box after it's complete... I'm not sure about > you, but doing a buildworld over nfs w/ a processor that is sub p133 > is not something that really works to well... Ah, now I understand your use of development. > I am planning on upgrading my 3.0-R to 3.3-R, but that won't fix anything > that allows me to build -current on it... Try -DNOTOOLS. I don't know if the -current sources depend specifically on -current tools (such as egcs). -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Ben Rosengart
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Garrett Wollman
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Jeremy Lea
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Jim Bloom
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Garrett Wollman
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Adam Strohl
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Peter Jeremy
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Peter Jeremy