"Donald J . Maddox" wrote in message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ummm... I'm not screaming anything, Gary. The intent of my message is > just to let the authors of this code know that it is *not* equal in > functionality to what was removed. As I said in my original message, it > would be nice to see that functionality restored. And how much time/resources are you willing to dedicate to restoration of functionality *YOU* need? > It may very well be that the authors are aware of this, and just don't > give a damn. I prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt. They probably give a damn, but it goes a long way if you HELP them rather than go around demanding stuff be put back. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Ollivier Robert
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Gary Palmer
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpn... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with newpn... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality with ... Gary Palmer
- Re: Loss of Functionality w... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionality w... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Chuck Robey
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Mike Smith
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Hellmuth Michaelis
- Re: Loss of Functionali... Donald J . Maddox