Mike Smith wrote: > > Matthew Dillon wrote:> thereabouts. Patches have been posted to several ma iling lists, I was > > wondering whether they've been committed somewhere along the line, and > > whether APM was safe for inclusion into a 4.0-CURRENT SMP kernel again. > > APM and SMP are not functional in -current; this broke with the new > BIOS call mechanism and I have not yet been able to fathom the nature > of the problem. According to Alan Cox (the Linux one), most APM BIOS implementations are fundamentally incompatable with SMP. (he said "all", not "most" actually). Using APM for anything more than "turn the box off" after shutting down all the AP's is going to be trouble, assuming he's right. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Michael Reifenberger
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Bruce Evans
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Mike Smith
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Peter Wemm
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Michael Reifenberger
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... N
- Re: 2xPIIIx450 results &... Mike Smith
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Peter Wemm
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Brad Knowles
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Brad Knowles
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Brad Knowles
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Brad Knowles
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Brad Knowles
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Dan Nelson
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Julian Elischer
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Matthew Dillon
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Julian Elischer
- Re: More benchmarking stuff... Matthew Dillon