<<On Mon, 06 Sep 1999 11:06:51 -0700, Jason Nordwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Wouldn't you hose uthread performance? I thought that one of the major
> benefits it that a context switch in uthreads did not require kernel
> intervention and a syscall.
It's true that this would (currently) slow down uthreads. However, I
suspect that uthreads may want to do its own signal-mask handling
anyway (even though it currently doesn't). On the other hand, if we
made jmp_buf and struct sigcontext compatible, it could clean up the
thread scheduler's inner workings.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires of freedom
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message