there was external code at TRW but I don't know if it is still in use..
We have uses of it here at whistle too. (that's why I wrote it..)
but I guess I can handle them...
why the change?
If you re-aranged the arguments you'd have EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER ==
at_shutdown_pri.
:-)
what are the selectabel (available) event queues?
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> That's right, systems will never shut down. 8)
>
> Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the
> ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the
> at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implementation.
>
> The upshot of this is that at_shutdown will go away. The old calls:
>
> at_shutdown(func, arg, queue)
> at_shutdown_pri(func, arg, queue, priority)
>
> will be replaced with
>
> EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER(queue, func, arg, priority)
>
> Due to the way the event handler works, this means that event handler
> functions which were originally
>
> void func(int howto, void *arg)
>
> will become
>
> void func(void *arg, int howto)
>
> This is unfortunate but more or less unavoidable.
>
> I will be converting all users of at_shutdown in the kernel to the new
> mechanism, but it's of some concern to me that there may be external
> code using the old at_shutdown* interfaces that may benefit from a
> compatibility interface (which could be done relatively easily).
>
> Is there significant interest in having this implemented?
>
> --
> \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith
> \\ of the man. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
