I see no point in the proposed mechanism. The scanner can still tell the difference between a port with a listener and a port with none. The only case in which the attacker is confounded would be in distinguishing a box which is down or off the net from a box which has *no* services and does not answer ping. I call that an uninteresting case. In the endless volley between attacker and defender, this would be a very feeble shot indeed. ______________________________________________________________________________ Matt Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fermilab "A5.1.5.2.7.1. Remove all classified and CCI boards from the COMSEC equipment, thoroughly smash them with a hammer or an ax, and scatter the pieces." To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Warner Losh
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RS... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Matt Crawford
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Leif Neland
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Ollivier Robert
- Re: Dropping connections without RS... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Warner Losh
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Garrett Wollman
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Archie Cobbs
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet