Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables

[Marcel Moolenaar]

"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:

> > : I suppose, but wouldn't the proper place be under machdep? I agree that
> > : a linux top-level MIB would be easiest to remember.
> >
> > Linux isn't machdep.  It is MI since we could have Linux/Alpha or
> > Linux/MIPS emulators...
> 
> Well then, we need to move it a directory level and take out machine
> dependencies, and make it machine independent.

A split of the Linux sources has been discussed already and isn't the issue
here. Please stay on topic or change the subject.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar                                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking & Databases                     http://www.scc.nl/
Amsterdam, The Netherlands                         tel: +31 20 4200655


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message