Why haven't changes like these been committed?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Russell L. Carter
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 12:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SMP and threads...
>
>
>
> |"David E. Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |>I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one
> processor.
> |>I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and
> there was a
> |>solution, I think it involved a patch.
> |>
> |>Any pointers?
> |
> |http://lt.tar.com
>
> And don't be turned off by the "outdated" tunnel Richard stuck
> up there, delete the two references to deferred signals in
> the libc_r code that gets copied over into the port.
> Then you get a thread implementation that still works better
> than libc_r for things like TAO. (Although I haven't had
> a chance to rerun the tests with the libc_r changes this
> week).
>
> Russell
>
> |
> |Tony.
> |--
> |f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] e pluribus unix
> |
> |
> |To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> |
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
