Any source we can have a look at (probe/attach/*_MODULE)?

Nick

On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, John Hay wrote:

 > Nope, it is an ISA driver and I wasn't that brave. :-) It is part of
 > standard FreeBSD and I just compiled it into the kernel with a kernel
 > config file.
 > 
 > > Are you by any chance kldload'ing the module for testing?
 > > 
 > > If so you should have:
 > > 
 > >         DEVMETHOD(bus_driver_added,     bus_generic_driver_added),
 > > 
 > > For your 'arc' device_method_t method declaration.
 > > 
 > > I got bit by this one too.
 > > 
 > > On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, John Hay wrote:
 > > > I have been trying to get my ar(4) and sr(4) drivers going again on -current,
 > > > but it seems that the newbus code doesn't like my little trick that worked
 > > > for so long. :-(
 > > > 
 > > > Basically the drivers are called ar0 in the kernel config file, but in
 > > > the isa_driver struct I call them arc and not ar, because the chip that
 > > > is used actually have 2 ports and I register them seperately as ar0 and
 > > > ar1 during the attach phase.
 > > > 
 > > > >From what I can see now, it looks like the newbus code doesn't even
 > > > call the arprobe routine. I have even added a printf right in the start
 > > > of it, but it never prints anything. Just as a test I changed my kernel
 > > > config file and files.i386 from ar to arc and then it works.
 > > >
 > > > So what should I do? Can the newbus code be fixed to work in this case
 > > > too or should I newbusify the drivers and will that help? Won't that
 > > > create a clash because of the isa compatabilty shim?
 > > > 
 > 
 > John
 > -- 
 > John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > 
 > 
 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
 > 
 > 

-- 
ISIS/STA, T.P.270, Joint Research Centre, 21020 Ispra, Italy



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to