>> > Put -O back in the COPTFLAGS.
>>
>> It works now. Is there any explaination why -O is required? :)
>
>Noone compiles without -O, so(/and) it's not supported. My take is
It is supported, but someone broke it.
>that EGCS says "Hey, I am in optimization level foobar! I can optimize
>for unused code. Hmm... that's unused, so...". Either that or its
>debugging support is really uNFed up.
-O works because optimisation removes an unused reference to a nonexistent
variable. The variable once existed and was used. It still exists under
a different name.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
