> + * The macro to choose one of these values does these steps: 1) Throw > + * away status word bits that cannot be masked. 2) Throw away the bits > + * currently masked in the control word, assuming the user isn't > + * interested in them anymore. 3) Reinsert status word bit 7 (stack Throwing away the status bits is rather restricting. This restriction could be avoided by passing back the status word within the third argument. A library function could be provided to implement your error code mapping while not limiting the kernel interface. Regards Douglas Crosher To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with ... Mike Smith
- Re: Using float emulator on a system w... Warner Losh
- Re: Using float emulator on a syst... Peter Jeremy
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with ... Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Julian Elischer
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Martin Cracauer
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Bruce Evans
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Martin Cracauer
- Proposed floating point changes (Re: Using flo... Martin Cracauer
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with ... Douglas Thomas Crosher
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Daniel Eischen
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Oliver Fromme
- Re: Using float emulator on a system with FPU? Bruce Evans