> We don't need the lock prefix for the current SMP implementation. A lock > prefix would be needed in a multithreaded implementation but should not be > added unless the kernel is an SMP kernel otherwise UP performance would > suffer. > > -- > Doug Rabson Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 > Lock prefix should be added to kernel modules if we want a single set for both SMP and UP. -lq To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was ... Alan Cox
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Doug Rabson
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was ... Alan Cox
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was ... Mike Haertel
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Peter Jeremy
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Doug Rabson
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably... Peter Wemm
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Doug Rabson
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: S... Oliver Fromme
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: S... Luoqi Chen
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Mike Haertel
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Mikhail Teterin
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Mike Smith