On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Yuri <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/28/2013 14:22, Evan Martin wrote: > >> Ah, you're using nspluginwrapper. Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper just >> doesn't work very well with Chrome. >> >> nspluginwrapper is actually unmaintained, and in working on Chrome for >> Linux we ran into so many problems with it that one of the Chrome >> developers took over maintainership in an attempt to fix some bugs! But in >> practice I don't think it'll ever work well. >> >> http://nspluginwrapper.org/ => last release was June 2011. >> > > Ok, I agree. nspluginwrapper probably won't ever work well. > But it works better in firefox for this same application. > So maybe this isn't nspluginwraspper fault in this case.
If only you knew how many hours I spent chasing down nspluginwrapper-related bugs while implementing Chrome's plugin support... :) But you are right, nspluginwrapper will likely always work better in Firefox. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
