https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=298348
Jamie Landeg-Jones <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Jamie Landeg-Jones <[email protected]> --- Hi! Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, I agree, your description is much clearer! Ultimately, I reported this because it bit me - I was using a reset rule assuming it would do the expected thing with an Ipv6 connection, but it was much later on I noticed that this setup was causing the icmp6 unreachable to be sent to the client, which is this case was suspicious. I want the port to appear simply as if nothing was listening, rather than the client knowing they'd been blocked! "reset6" (which I didn't previously realise existed) did the job, but because "reset" didn't specifically mention Ipv4 only, that's what originally threw me. So I think that anything that clarifies this is a win, but yes, your phrasing is better still. Cheers, Jamie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
