https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=267028
--- Comment #346 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-f...@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to George Mitchell from comment #344)
You might want to adjust the text of the panic as well,
so that the wording does not mislead folks reading what
is reported by the panic: no longer suggest the
condition's status.
It looks to me like the code:
if ((frame->tf_rflags & PSL_I) == 0) {
/*
* Buggy application or kernel code has disabled
* interrupts and then trapped. Enabling interrupts
* now is wrong, but it is better than running with
* interrupts disabled until they are accidentally
* enabled later.
*/
. . .
would still happen and do:
default:
printf(
"kernel trap %d with interrupts
disabled\n",
type);
/*
* We shouldn't enable interrupts while holding
a
* spin lock.
*/
if (td->td_md.md_spinlock_count == 0)
enable_intr();
It might be that Andriy was suggesting avoiding parts
of this in some way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
