https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280801
--- Comment #6 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Alan Somers from comment #4) My vote is in considering them all as remote. (In reply to Alan Somers from comment #5) It is not optimal but good enough, this is beyond me so I don't know if fusefs can be required to somehow announce if it is a remotefs. Given that freebsd has control of the base system and ports, unlike gnu, including and excluding should be easier no? This is offtopic but I thought I could do a wrapper that if it found -l would run the appropriate command as in -t nofoo,nobar as the manpage states that you add "no" as a prefix, as in: > /bin/df -Thn -t nofusefs.rclone,nofusefs.sshfs I thought that to mean to each item, but instead its if you add no it goes into a strange exclusion mode? IDK if the man page should be changed or if it is correct on that regard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
