https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252835

            Bug ID: 252835
           Summary: ice(4) driver queue timeout is too short
           Product: Base System
           Version: 12.2-RELEASE
          Hardware: amd64
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: kern
          Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
          Reporter: brian90...@gmail.com

Hello,

I have been testing an Intel E810-CQDA 2x100GbE network card using FreeBSD-12.2
(GERNRIC+INVARIANTS). When using both ports in netmap mode with 16 queues, I
have observed a panic after seeing messages like:

ice1: Rx queue 13 disable timeout

(seen on both ice0 and ice1, different queue numbers) print to the console.
Digging into the cause of that error message, I discovered it is printed when
ice_is_rxq_ready() returns ETIMEDOUT because the queue is not in a consistent
state after looping ICE_Q_WAIT_RETRY_LIMIT(5) times with a delay of 10us each
loop.

For testing, I increased ICE_Q_WAIT_RETRY_LIMIT to 500 (total delay of 5ms
possible) and returned the index from ice_is_rxq_ready() when the state became
consistent so I could view the actual delays required.

A few minute test starting and stopping pkt-gen instances on both ice0 and ice1
gave me the following data. Second column is delay in us; first column is count
of rows.

4952 0
2561 10
 186 20
  92 40
  78 30
  22 50
   5 60
   2 130
   1 70
   1 90
   1 100
   1 120
   1 150
   1 190

So the default timeout of 50us does cover the majority of queue commands but in
just a few minutes I observed the driver needing up to 190us for a queue to
become consistent. This testing was performed on an AMD Threadripper 3990x
supporting PCIe4.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to