https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244178
--- Comment #1 from Alan Somers <asom...@freebsd.org> --- In step 5, are you extending the underlying file from EOF onwards, or are you rewriting the whole thing? And in step 7, is the data correct up until the old EOF, or is it all wrong? Do you have a standalone test case that can demonstrate the problem? It sounds to me like the correct answer might be for the fuse server to return FOPEN_DIRECT_IO for every FUSE_OPEN request. That would prevent the kernel from using the cache at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
