https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243212
Bug ID: 243212 Summary: High CPU usage when set affinity on multiple CPU Product: Base System Version: 12.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: pizza...@freebsd.org We are facing a minor, but disturbing regression, when we moved from FreeBSD 11.3 to 12.1 on our loadbalancers. We have 2 identical machines (dual CPU, 4 core per CPU), one running FreeBSD 11.3 and one running 12.1. Identical packages and identical configuration. We have a haproxy instance and, for performance reasons, we pin the threads to different cpus: nbproc 1 nbthread 6 cpu-map auto:1/1-6 0-5 The result of this configuration is (on 11.3): # cpuset -g -p 35799 pid 35799 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 while on 12.1 is: # cpuset -g -p 86498 pid 86498 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 pid 86498 domain policy: first-touch mask: 0, 1 What we have seen is a increased CPU usage (2x) and system load (almost doubled) on FreeBSD 12.1. We didn't measure a potential impact on the network latency. A way to solve/workaround the issue is to decrease the number of threads to 4. I guess that this regression has something to do with NUMA, maybe threads 4,5 are forced to use memory domain 0, causing the additional CPU usage. Is this intended? If yes, why on FreeBSD 11.3 we don't see this high CPU usage? Thanks in advance for the help I report here some hardware information. hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 0 @ 3.30GHz hw.ncpu: 8 kern.sched.topology_spec: <groups> <group level="1" cache-level="0"> <cpu count="8" mask="ff,0,0,0">0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7</cpu> <children> <group level="2" cache-level="3"> <cpu count="4" mask="f,0,0,0">0, 1, 2, 3</cpu> <children> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="1,0,0,0">0</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="2,0,0,0">1</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="4,0,0,0">2</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="8,0,0,0">3</cpu> </group> </children> </group> <group level="2" cache-level="3"> <cpu count="4" mask="f0,0,0,0">4, 5, 6, 7</cpu> <children> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="10,0,0,0">4</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="20,0,0,0">5</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="40,0,0,0">6</cpu> </group> <group level="3" cache-level="2"> <cpu count="1" mask="80,0,0,0">7</cpu> </group> </children> </group> </children> </group> </groups> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"