https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241710
--- Comment #9 from Konstantin Belousov <k...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #8) Could you, please, read some code instead of commit messages, before coming with conclusions ? The sizing of exec_map is scaled with number of cpus. It is already pared down on ILP32 due to KVA exhaustion issues. Even if we assume that the bump is from 4M to 8M (which is not), it is already quite sensitive for low-KVA machines. On my low-end (8 threads but amd64) desktop machine, I have ~17M reserved for the submap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
