https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233405
--- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #10) For us, they’re both defined, and we only support sparc64. The un-numbered variant was already used in that file, so I just followed existing convention. The upstream numbers (cursor words) are probably intended for 32bit Sparc. So this isn’t literally the patch to upstream, if you cared to, but retaining 32bit Sparc isn’t too difficult. It’s odd- the clang/llvm sparc support is heavily v8 (pre-64bit) focused, but the (rough, minimal) LLD support is V9 *only*. Different contributors, patchwork support... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
