https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240545
--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> --- It is definitely ok for malloc, mallocarray, and realloc. (We have a kernel reallocf? Huh.) Honestly, reallocf with M_WAITOK seems like a mistake — those could instead/additionally be replaced with just realloc(M_WAITOK). > Are there any cases to be aware of for why the check would be necessary with > M_WAITOK? Yes, contigmalloc() can fail with M_WAITOK; some of the busdma allocation stuff can fail with M_WAITOK. Normal malloc / UMA allocations with M_WAITOK can't return NULL (just sleep indefinitely). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
