https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Belousov <k...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Greg Lewis from comment #3) I am not proposing to interpret any SIGSEGV as a stack overflow. I propose to consider a SIGSEGV as the stack overflow if it occured in the range of [guard_start; stack_end) for the given stack, instead of the current implementation which considers the range [guard_start; guard_end) (at least this is how I understand what is going on by your explanation). I can also add e.g. procctl(PROC_STACKGUARD) but to convince me to do that you would need to explain why the above approach is not sufficient. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
