https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211823
--- Comment #6 from Christian Heckendorf <heckendo...@gmail.com> --- Both variables hold the same value in their internal representation (0xcc00) but cg_old_niblk overflows into negative values due to type limitations that fs_ipg doesn't have. Clearly check_cgmagic() thinks the fs data is invalid yet somehow OpenBSD fsck thinks it works and the filesystem in general seems to work fine on both OS, at least from a basic usage standpoint (I haven't looked into anything more than basic I/O and whether fsck says clean or dirty). Is this check in check_cgmagic meant to compare internal representations or their signed/unsigned integer values? Is general compatibility between UFS in OpenBSD and FreeBSD purely accidental? If so, I'll drop the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
