https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208529
Frans-Jan van Steenbeek <frans-...@van-steenbeek.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |frans-...@van-steenbeek.net
--- Comment #3 from Frans-Jan van Steenbeek <frans-...@van-steenbeek.net> ---
Created attachment 170744
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=170744&action=edit
Suggested patch
See attached suggested patch.
Assuming people use unbound-control with local_unbound is a bit of a stretch,
especially since unbound-control-setup isn't even bundled. This patch tests the
functionality of the local resolver, which is just as good or even better than
querying the state. It assumes that local_unbound is configured to run on IPv4
localhost and that the .com zone is not somehow disabled or inaccessible. These
assumptions are *way* smaller than assuming unbound-control works. Besides
that, failure is less "messy" to look at.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
