The following reply was made to PR bin/166994; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@gmplib.org Cc: t...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/166994: m4(1): m4's eval function ignores documented 2nd and 3rd arguments Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:34:51 -0500
To be clear, the 'patched' state means "fixed in HEAD, but fix still needs to be MFC'd". If someone doesn't plan on merging it they mark a bug as "closed", not "patched". That said, it is odd for someone to mark a bug as patched unless they are also assigning it to themselves and assuming responsibility for merging it. Tijl, are you planning on merging the fix to at least stable/9? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
