The following reply was made to PR conf/181681; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Unovitch <jason.unovi...@gmail.com> To: "free...@omnilan.de" <free...@omnilan.de> Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/181681: periodic inline security output missing with daily_show_success=NO Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:59:55 -0400 Harry, Conf/178611 fixed the issue and that is what is in 9.2. I just tested=20 each use case on 9.2-RC4 and they work as reading the=20 450.status-security and /usr/sbin/periodic would suggest. With this=20 /etc/periodic.conf: daily_show_success=3D"NO" daily_status_security_inline=3D"YES" The "daily run output" periodic email shows the inline output (abbreviate= d) =2E.. Security check: Checking setuid files and devices: =2E..continued It looks fine. Both these /etc/periodic.conf examples do the exact same = thing. The 450.status-security script sets a blank string right at the=20 top because of inline being set and the rc=3D3 case results in it always = being show. Outputting to a file or other user gets ignored because of=20 inline. daily_show_success=3D"NO" daily_status_security_inline=3D"YES" daily_status_security_output=3D/tmp/file daily_show_success=3D"NO" daily_status_security_inline=3D"YES" daily_status_security_output=3Droot Without the inline, this one results in the security output being=20 written to a file. daily_show_success=3D"NO" daily_status_security_output=3D/tmp/file This one results in the security output going to my user account. daily_show_success=3D"NO" daily_status_security_output=3Djason -Jason Unovitch On 09/16/2013 05:09 AM, free...@omnilan.de wrote: > Bez=FCglich Jason Unovitch's Nachricht vom 04.09.2013 02:21 (localtim= e): >> Harald, >> By any chance do you have a work around for the original broken >> version of 450.status.security in 9.1-RELEASE? I submitted PR conf/178= 611 > Hello Jason, > > sorry for that late reply, just want to let you know that I don't have > anything further arround and unfortunately haven't looked into your > conf/178611 yet. > >> for a patch in 9.1-RELEASE and have been using the patched version >> successfully with the same options ever since. I have also tested >> 9.2-RC3 and do not see the issue described. Additionally, 6 lines >> below the suggested patch the "rc=3D1" used get overridden anyway by a= n > Couldn't you reproduce the problem from your PR (conf/178611) with > 9.2-RC3 or the probleme here (conf/181681)? The problem here is clearly= > =84by design=93 and should be seen unconditionally. > > Thanks, > > -Harry > _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
