>Number: 156817
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: WITHOUT_CDDL and NO_CTF ignored if WITH_CTF defined
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed May 04 15:30:09 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: David O'Brien
>Release: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
The FreeBSD Project
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD dragon.NUXI.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #664 r221012M:
Mon Apr 25 08:32:28 PDT 2011 r...@dragon.nuxi.org:/sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386
>Description:
Starting with r206082 (I believe), the "-DNO_CTF" became ignored
in the "stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims",
"stage 1.2: bootstrap tools", "stage 2.3: build tools", and
"stage 3: cross tools" parts of the build if
WITH_CTF=yes is in '/etc/src.conf'.
John Birrell's claim in r179233 is that these stages of the build
do not require CTF conversion.
Additionally, it appears that WITH_CTF now has higher precidence
than WITHOUT_CDDL. [WITH_CTF=yes in /etc/src.conf combined with
'make -DWITHOUT_CDDL buildworld' or WITHOUT_CDDL=yes in /etc/make.conf]
If so, I feel this is wrong as if someone has set WITHOUT_CDDL
they have strong licensing needs (restrictions). And so not
running the CTF tools is of lesser importance than accidently
falling into a legal problem.
>How-To-Repeat:
Perform builds with the above settings and look at the output
>Fix:
revisit r206082.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
