>Number:         156484
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       ntpd regularly flips between PLL and FLL mode (time sync 
>status change 6001/2001)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Apr 18 22:40:07 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jeremy Chadwick
>Release:        FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD icarus.home.lan 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Mar 24 
04:21:44 PDT 2011 
r...@icarus.home.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X7SBA_RELENG_8_amd64 amd64
>Description:
        ntpd on FreeBSD machines, including that on RELENG_8 source dated
        in March 2011 (ntpd 4.2.4p5), regularly flips between PLL
        and FLL mode.  This can be seen in one's log files as such:

Apr 15 14:36:14 ra ntpd[946]: kernel time sync status change 6001
Apr 15 15:01:53 ra ntpd[946]: kernel time sync status change 2001

        I'm seeing this on literally all production servers which sync
        off of public time sources.  Servers which sync off of local
        time sources (stratum 3) do not see the problem, but I doubt
        that's of any relevancy.

        These logging messages were disabled in the most recent version
        of ntpd-dev according to the official NTP developers (see
        comment #10):

        http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452

        Using "maxpoll 9" as a workaround, which was proposed in 2006,
        also does not solve the problem, but does decrease the regularity
        of it:

        
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031512.html
>How-To-Repeat:
        n/a
>Fix:
        Given that this annoyance has existed for many years now, can we
        please work on getting the most recent ntpd into FreeBSD?

        The latest stable build is 4.2.6p3, but I don't know if this
        removes the printing of the messages or not (see bugs.ntp.org
        URL, comment #5).  Someone would need to review the source code.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to