The post below shows up at #7 in google search for "freebsd pf version". The title of the post is "Do not use FreeBSD 9.0 as a PF firewall "
Probably a "known issue", but it could be useful to demand a follow-up post along the lines "9.2 is now the norm and sysutils/pftop is no longer broken". Failing that, lets set up a "FreeBSD malicious sites" page, where deliberately misleading content or sites witch refuse to correct their slander are listed and pushed on to search engines. Just as a newspaper must retract erroneous news reports, Blogs are also obligated to publish corrective measures taken by the companies or organizations which they have accused. ----- FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Correction-for-tp5869061.html Sent from the freebsd-advocacy mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
