On 09/26/15 00:42, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 09/26/15 09:26, Colin Percival wrote: >> I think there is consensus for: >> * Using a sysctl (simpler than a device node), > > Presumably a read/write tunable sysctl, RWTUN?
I suppose it could be, but the intention here was to block suspend while we're shutting down, not to have it always blocked. The sysctl isn't a configuration setting, it's a userland-kernel communications channel. -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
