On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and without > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel. > > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they were > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any longer. > > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea.
FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it "works" with vt(4). -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
