On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:29:39AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:59:09 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 29 January 2013 10:50, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:24:29 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> > wrote: > > > > > On 28 January 2013 06:49, Lars Engels <lars.eng...@0x20.net> wrote: > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:55:40AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > > > > >>> Hi all, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I recently purchased a Lenovo Y530 and attempted to use some of > the > > > > >>> ACPI features (brightness of backlight, etc.) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I attempted to load acpi_ibm but devd reported no events (running > with > > > > >>> devd -dD). What information might be useful to help support this > > > > >>> laptop? > > > > >> > > > > >> Did you set dev.acpi_ibm.0.events=1? > > > > > > > > > > I don't see this as an option at all. > > > > > > > > Setting dev.acpi_ibm.0.events=1 still does not cause the brightness > > > > functions to generate events. Could the initialmask and or availmask > > > > tie into this in some way? > > > > > > Have we seen 'sysctl dev.acpi_ibm' from this machine yet? Maybe clues? > > > Ideally after kldload acpi_ibm and before any sysctl changes .. > > > > [3462 root@gravity /home/eitan ]#kldload acpi_ibm.ko > > [3463 root@gravity /home/eitan ]#sysctl dev.acpi_ibm > > sysctl: unknown oid 'dev.acpi_ibm' > > Ah right. I don't suppose kldload -v shows anything useful about the > problem loading it? Ah, never mind, it may be obvious .. lightly > skimming your asl.y530.gz, I recalled folks having to patch something > for Lenovo rather than IBM OEMIDs .. hunt, hunt .. ok, here it is: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/164538 > > > I assume this is either missing a device ID and/or not the right driver at > all. > > Hopefully adding the LEN0068 to ibm_ids might allow acpi_ibm to load; if > not more digging may be needed for this model. > > > I mentioned this was a Lenovo IdeaPad Y530 > > I'm assuming running 9.x? I didn't see uname output in this thread. > > Strange; according to that PR this was supposed to have been MFC'd last > November, but didn't make it into 9.1-RELEASE sources. Committer cc'd. > > cheers, Ian
9.1 was already branched at the time I MFCed it to 9-STABLE so not it didn't make into 9.1-RELEASE. regards, Bapt
pgpWfxqUCN9Rw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
