On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Timo Teras <timo.te...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:08:16 +0300 Vasily Khoruzhick > <anars...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That could be an alignment issue, could you guys try attached patch? >> At least it should not break anything. > > It should not be. The structure is aligned properly - though adding the > packed attribute is probably a good idea.
I mean structure fields alignment. sizeof() and offset of fields could differ on different platforms if you do not specify "packed" attribute explicitly > The length mismatch does not come from the structure size. Hmm, libusb_fill_bulk_transfer receives sizeof(struct uru4k_image) as a buffer size argument > The USB data transfer is always short (less than requested) due to how > the device works. And in this case the USB stack returns actually one > more byte than what the device sent. So it really sounds like USB stack > issue (kernel or libusb) that triggers on the target hardware only. Ok. > - Timo Regards Vasily _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list fprint@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
