Am 01.11.2023 um 06:18 schrieb Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal:
I'm curious how the capturer is created in the case of anonymous functions. I 
know the function needs to create a capturer when nested functions are declared 
but what happens if there is an anonymous function which is declared in the 
code section?

I think the compiler will only know about the requirement to create a capturer 
at this point but local variables have already been assigned so do they need to 
do an extra copy to the capturer when it's created?

With nested function this is not a problem since the capturer can be created 
before any locals are assigned and thus not copying is needed, if I understand 
correctly.

The most important piece of knowledge is that in a routine with nested (or anonymous) routines the nested (or anonymous) routines aren't compiled down to machine code right away. The compiler first parses the whole hierarchy until it's on the global/method level again and only *then* it compiles the outermost routine followed by the nested ones.

Now for nested as well as anonymous routines the compiler determines whether a capturer is required at the point that the nested or anonymous routine is assigned to a function reference (cause otherwise it can be handled as a nested function or even a function or method pointer). This requirement is detected during the parsing of the routine.

If the routine requires a capturer then after the whole hierarchy has been parsed, then all the captured variables will be moved from the local symtable of the routine to the capturer or corresponding capture variables for parameters will be introduced and then the whole nodetree will be walked to adjust usages of the involved symbols.

So, no, there is no copy involved (except for parameter values right at the start of a routine where a parameter is captured) as the whole variables are relocated into the capturer and they're only ever accessed from there.

Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to