On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote:

Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:

$M controls the inclusion of RTTI, i.e. it allows or disallows the use of the published section.
No more, no less.

I don't see any use in allowing or disallowing something. And with the current design, it is, as I said, impossible, without macros, to compile the same code with {$M+} and {$M-}.

While I agree with your statement about allowing/disallowing use of
'published' based on a directive, we inherited this from Delphi and it is a very basic part of the language & RTL, so changing it is simply not an option.

The extended RTTI is meant to remedy this (also in Delphi), but IMO it introduces its own problems (you'll love the amount of compiler directives it needs ;)).

I'm surprised to hear about your failure to get fcl-passrc to work, since it is used to create the docs based on the fpc sources. Additionally it forms the basis of pas2js, which fully supports all FPC constructs.

That said, I realize the (correct) use of fcl-passrc may be a bit hermetic...

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to