> On Aug 10, 2023, at 10:49 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote: > > Then you simply aren't using them often enough. E.g. the RTTI internal code > is full of them and additional typecasts would simply muddle up otherwise > relatively clear code. > Here's a question, what is the full list of possible pointer operators? I didn't even know about pointer - pointer until now and there may be more. Regards, Ryan Joseph _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer question Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer question Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer quest... Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer q... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Point... Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer quest... Elmar Haneke via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Pointer q... Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] Point... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
- Re: [fpc-pascal] ... Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-pascal