> On Feb 10, 2021, at 7:47 PM, Martin Frb via fpc-pascal
> <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>
> I understand it is for conflict resolution only. But see my example => as
> soon as you need to repeat a trait with just a change in name, you always
> need conflict resolution.
Please post the code snippet again. I'm not sure I understand what you're
saying. The most important thing here is that we don't allow the programmer to
write ambiguous code. If all else fails the code must fail to compiler, if
there's any chance of any conflict whatsoever. The first reason this idea gets
shot down is because people think of crazy "with" statement bugs and we need to
avoid that at all costs.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
