On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:18 AM Ben Grasset <operato...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know what you mean, and I'm aware, but you actually kind of can to the > fairly straightforward extent that I'm concerned about with Ryan's patch > (i.e. simply passing constant results as constraints rather than function > parameters.) > Also, if you were referring specifically to the "making the choice part", looking at the PDQSort C++ code again, all it was actually doing is evaluating the *types* involved, not the comparison function itself. Which would be fairly straightforward to replicate in FPC using something like a constant TTypeKind constraint.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
