> On Oct 13, 2019, at 6:18 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>
> wrote:
>
>>> Well spotted. I didn't notice that the extension was missing.
>>>
>>> That will definitely not be done in fcl-passrc.
>
> To be clear:
>
> here I meant that 'currently that will definitely not be done in fcl-passrc.'
This is a problem then because I wanted to make a language server for FPC but
if the parser doesn’t understand accepted FPC syntax the whole thing falls
apart. Can you make an FPC complient mode or something then? IMO if the parser
included with the compiler doesn’t understand the same syntax as the compiler
then we’re in trouble.
Here’s basically what I’m doing to parse. Nothing special and the engine is
just a template that does just the minimum (like the examples in the package).
module := ParseSource(engine, ’bugs.pas', 'darwin', 'x86_64');
- This is a new version from 3 days ago.
- The record sections failed because they are inside a function. If I pull the
record out of the function they work.
- Please test the operator because I don’t think the parser understands it.
{$mode objfpc}
{$modeswitch advancedrecords}
program bugs;
type
TMyRecordA = record
class operator = (constref a, b: TMyRecordA): boolean;
end;
class operator TMyRecordA.= (constref a, b: TMyRecordA): boolean;
begin
result := (@a = @b);
end;
procedure DoThis;
type
TMyRecordB = record
private
x, y, z: integer;
end;
begin
end;
begin
end.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
