> On Apr 13, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Martin Frb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Were it only the documentation of nil-ability then comments would do the job.
> When it is about a more generic approach then see the wikipage about
> contracts. (I did mail a link)
If there was any other way the compiler could make this contract more concrete
and reliable then comments I’d be happy to hear it.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
