> On Jan 3, 2019, at 6:20 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Correct. ";" separates different parameter types, "," separates those of the
> same type. Though I agree with Mattias that "const T, const U" (with or
> without ": Integer") should not work (but then "T, const U" should also not
> work for consistency).
> Essentially it should behave like a routine's parameter clause.
I guess that makes sense that if a type parameter is followed by a const
parameter then those are essentially different types and following the same
logic should be separated with a semicolon.
That means the parser only knows if a ; is required after the const keyword is
found. Does that matter?
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
