On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 09.09.2018 um 16:16 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote:
It seems syntacticly possible that default properties could be
recursive by having a default property reference a record/class with
another default property. Should that be allowed?
I don't think so. Let's start with 1 level.
For default arrays it's also only one level deep.
Ehm... news flash:
I know that, but I meant you cannot immediatly go to the second level.
You must specify the 2 indexes as in:
Writeln(Test[21][2]);
Though one can argue that default array properties are used explicitely
using the "[…]"-syntax while a non-array default property is
automatically triggered with ".".
Yes.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
