> On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:16 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>
> wrote:
>
> The whole point of 'default' is to be able to make this assignment, for
> example to implement nullable types.
Just thought about this some more and realized that if you’re thinking more in
terms of nullable types (which rely totally on assigning if I understand what
you mean) than that’s why my idea to have multiple defaults just doesn't make
any sense at all.
Does it make more sense if I say for “write” properties (like used for nullable
types) there is only one default property allowed but for read-only there could
be multiple properties? That mitigates some of the concern I think. If we add
compiler errors I think we can make this is very safe feature.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
